The cost of the smoking ban

Had enough yet? 1 Comment »

I just heard this during our local news… (also documented here)

Enforcing the idiotic Ohio smoking ban has cost Montgomery County $70,000 in the past year.

$3800 in fines have been issued.

$450 in fines have been collected.

No word about how much complying with the law has cost private businesses in terms of facility rennovations and lost customers.

Meanwhile, the front page of the Dayton Daily News today moans about the millions of dollars schools are having to do without. Way to prioritize, idiots. 

My first post for the second President

Pseudo-intellectual BS 2 Comments »

Perhaps it’s a bit late to write about the HBO mini-series John Adams considering all seven episodes have aired. Or perhaps not, because the excellent writing, acting, and production quality of the series is bound to make it timeless and equally as appealing in years to come as it is presently. As I’ve stated in a previous post, some thoughts about the series have occurred and re-occurred to me, but I haven’t been able to write them down in a coherent form that all two of my readers can follow. I realized as I was writing last night that I must either produce something now, or forget it and wait patiently for the next thing that gets my typing fingers hot enough to pound out some stream-of-consciousness screed. To that end, I’ve decided to write short pieces about the series (driven by the soundtrack in my headphones) as the mood hits me.

I’ll state that, somewhat to my embarrassment, I’m mildly obsessed with the series and the main character for reasons related to a similar fascination I have with House and Richard Nixon: I’m drawn to characters and people that have genuinely useful intellect, people of accomplishment and contribution, but who emotionally struggle with common situations and people, especially themselves. I’ve read David McCullough’s book and I’ve known quite a bit about John Adams since I was young due to my personal interest in the American Revolution. To see a television series dedicated to the one founding father probably most responsible for our independence is scant compensation in place of any formal memorial for the man in our nation’s capitol. Of all the founding fathers who played major roles during the revolution and who were early Presidents, Adams is the only one without the formal recognition of a monument or a portrait on currency. Jefferson and Washington both get elaborate memorials and a bill and coin each featuring their portrait, and Adams gets nothing! That’s damn unfair, and damn unappreciative of the country and countrymen who owe him so much. (Sam Adams, a more minor player, still has a beer named after him, even though he ran a brewery into the ground two centuries ago.)

The series is full of moments that, with twenty-first century hindsight, I would have loved to have seen in person. Imagine walking with the Adamses during the night to the hill just outside their home overlooking Boston to see the British fleet shelling the fortifications around the city, knowing that this marks the beginning of the Revolutionary War. What must the feeling be like to watch teams of men drag captured cannons from Fort Ticonderoga through the mud, lead by Henry Knox, past the Adams home to the heights over Boston, knowing those cannons will force a British retreat? (Even though there wasn’t powder or a single cannon ball for any of them!) How thrilling and unforgettable would it have been to witness Washington’s inauguration, either from the street or behind him on the balcony, to hear the man’s voice speak the oath, and to be overtaken by the cheering of the crowd? (Adams’s acknowledgement as Vice President on the balcony with Washington is his finest moment in the series, in my opinion.) Surely it would be awe-inspiring, and maybe a little weird, to ride a wagon into Washington City, as they called it, which was a tree-filled swamp, and then come to a clearing with a half-finished White House constructed in the middle. The creative people associated with the production did an outstanding job of recreating these moments and scenes for the audience. Reading and imagining it are one thing, but to have it presented before you as reality is something else entirely.

To close this post, I want to write something about David Morse and Paul Giamatti. David Morse, who played George Washington, had quite a task set for him. He could easily have played the character too narrowly and made him out to be all hero and no human. Not so, thankfully. Washington certainly was a gentleman and a aristocrat of his time, but he also had a temper and ambition, and without going over the top, Morse plays Washington about as well as anyone ever may. And Paul Giamatti owns the character of John Adams. Although the series seems to primarily focus on the negatives and trials of Adams’s life, Giamatti manages to perfectly portray Adams’s self-deprication and dry humor when necessary, and I very much enjoyed that. The range of emotions necessary for playing the character, from disowning his own son and his grief at Abagail’s death, to the triumphant moment life was breathed into the Constitution as Washington was sworn in, has to be difficult for any actor. As much as some people may dismiss acting as a trivial skill, it must take stamina and fortitude to bring these emotions to the screen day after day. I’m sure both Mr. Morse and Mr. Giamatti will sleep better tonight knowing they have my approval and appreciation.

I wonder what he smoked, because I’d like to try one

Had enough yet? 1 Comment »

I’ve wanted to write about the HBO mini-series John Adams for some time now, but I’m not able to put my thoughts together in any presentable way that I would expect others to read and follow. And I have tried. And I’ll probably try again.

This evening, however, I discovered that the soundtrack to the series is available, and I promptly purchased it through iTunes. While waiting for the download, I perused some of the reviews at Amazon and came across this mind-numbing gem of colossal stupidity:

A terrific series with brilliant cinematography! I DO wish that the producers (Tom Hanks certainly had the say) had left out the use of the tobacco drug. We don’t need smoking or other use of tobacco in ANY movie. Otherwise, a memorable series that everyone over the age of 12 should see! I understand that the DVD extras as really supposed to be something. I’ve already got my order in for the set.

Emphasis added.

I responded with this comment, which I want to re-print here before Amazon takes it down:

Of all the unpleasant things depicted in the series that are historical factualities… tarring and feathering, inoculations with a rusty unsterile cutting implement, life-threatening disease of all kinds, graphic tooth decay, chronic alcoholism, amputation of a leg from a man still awake and the associated gore, a masectomy performed on a woman who could do little except bite down on a pencil, and whatever else I’ve forgotten to list… you’ve chosen to complain about John Adams *smoking cigars* as something inappropriate? This is exactly the kind of anti-tobacco zealotry that further reinforces the nanny state which founding fathers such as John Adams would have fought with every last fiber of his being. It seems that the point of John Adams’s life, and the series, are lost on you.

Freedom. The freedom to make mistakes and bad decisions (if you consider smoking such) included. Especially included. Having the personal preferences of others forced upon you by the law is not freedom.

And as a somewhat related stinger, I want to add this for those of you who have seen the series or have any meaningful understanding of John Adams: Think of Adams, his life, his principles, his accomplishments, his obstacles, and his integrity; and then take a good look at the three candidates we’re considering right now. If you don’t feel some sense of sadness, of regret, of apprehension for our republic, then I call into serious question your patriotism, your perspective, and the value you assign comfort at freedom’s expense.

Using iChat 4 (Leopard) with a Netgear FVS338 firewall

Mac OS X No Comments »

There seems to be precious little information about this topic available on the web, so once again I’d like to post what I’ve discovered with the hope that some curious Google searcher will find it helpful.

Netgear’s FVS338 firewall (firmware 3.0.2-21) currently does not support UPnP. However, it does support port triggering. Without getting into too many technical details, in order to use the voice, video, and desktop sharing features of iChat with your FVS338, you need to configure some port triggering rules under Security -> Port Triggering in the web management interface. Below is a screen capture of the settings you’ll need. Click the thumbnail for a full-sized graphic.

FVS338 port triggering config for iChat

If you find this helpful, or if this configuration isn’t quite correct and you have a suggestion for improving it, please feel free to leave a comment.

The Blizzard of 2008

Cool stuff 5 Comments »

We’re currently in the middle of receiving 12+ inches of snow at my home in Bellbrook. We took the opportunity this afternoon to get a few pictures of the dogs. They stink and they’re rowdy and they get their hair all over every damn thing in my house and they turn expensive dog food into poo, but we love ‘em.

dsc00940.jpg
Here they are wrestling in the yard. Watch out for those flopping ears.

dsc00961.jpg
This is a really good shot of little dog, the youngest.

dsc00962.jpg
The oldest one, on the left, is attempting to chew a frozen tennis ball.

dsc00967.jpg
Little dog looks like she’s about to fly away.

dsc00974.jpg

dsc00975.jpg
These shots are of a growing snow shelf that’s protruding from our roof, probably about 12 inches or so.

Ok, that’s all from my mundane life today.

WP Theme & Icons by N.Design Studio
Entries RSS Comments RSS Log in