Aaron Adams’s Blowhard Blog

From Fox News today:

Sex Offenders Try to Block Laws Allowing Them to Be ID’d Online

A couple of tidbits I found interesting:

The plaintiffs claim the law is broad enough now to apply to a wide range of offenses ranging from child molestation to rape to theft of a pornographic magazine from a store.

Unreal! And unacceptable.

One plaintiff, identified as Doe 2 in court documents, said neither he nor his attorney at the time understood that lifetime supervision would apply after he pleaded guilty in 2001 to a sex offense, or that he would continue to be banned from going to parks or schools.

He said that during an acrimonious divorce his ex-wife accused him of sexually assaulting her 14-year-old daughter. He faced five felony charges but pleaded guilty to one count of attempted lewdness with a minor under 14, and was sentenced to 5 years probation.

“I never touched my stepdaughter or any other child inappropriately,” he said in the affidavit, which says he took a plea deal to spare his children the embarrassment of a trial. “I was not told that there would be any restrictions on me whatsoever after I was done with probation.”

The anger I feel towards the evil - and I use that word purposely - people who enact and enforce these laws inevitably turns into sadness for their victims. All that is required for evil to triumph is for good people to do nothing, and we’re doing nothing.

I can see where this is all headed in the long term, can’t you?

“Those fags across the street sure do seem to have their limp-wristed friends over a lot. Who the hell knows what kind of sickening sexual perversion they’re up to inside that house? I better let the police know because if one of them so much as looks at my kid the wrong way, I’m gonna have the sex offender patrol on their ass to make their lives miserable and move them the hell out of my neighborhood. Hey, if you don’t like it, don’t be gay. This is a neighborhood for families and normal people, not perverts. Perverts need to be tracked and set straight in order to protect the children.”

“That guy who just moved in a couple of doors down seems weird. He’s gotta be what, 35? And I don’t think he has a girlfriend. I’ll bet a dollar he’s some kind of queer or child molester. I’d better let the cops know just in case he tries to pull anything fishy with my kid. This is about protecting the children. That’s society’s primary responsiblilty.”

I know for a fact these attitudes and lines of thinking exist because I hear them spoken out loud on a frequent basis.

What if, unholiest of all unholies, you’re gay and a smoker. The universe might implode around you. My rational mind cannot imagine the torture and humiliation gay smokers will be subject to just before their legally-imposed deaths in the name of inoffensiveness and protecting the children in our future nanny state utopia.

I’m not kidding. I’m not exaggerating. I’m not employing hyperbole. I hope I don’t live long enough to see things deteriorate to this point, but I do hope a record of my blog exists long enough to prove me right, even though the clean-lunged, sexually pure society of future pussies will read it as heresy.